The quality of a sapphire is determined by how closely the grown crystal matches the ideal structure with respect to the arrangement of atoms within the lattice, dislocations, defects, and stress.  The root causes for these problems often originate from insufficient purity of the starting material and the growth process itself. Additionally, the observance of bubbles in the crystal provides a baseline from which crystal quality is determined because bubbles serve as scattering centers for any light transmitted through a sapphire optic, thus reducing its performance.

Impurities in sapphire can influence the performance of sapphire optical elements in critical applications. Impurities can come from the raw material; typically, alumina powder or Verneuil sapphire, often referred to as “crackle.” Contamination can also come from the surrounding insulation during the crystal growth process.

Permissible impurity levels differ for each element but are typically less than two parts per million (ppm) for optical grade sapphire.  Titanium and chromium, for example, must be kept below 1 ppm because these atoms are color centers that result in pink crystals if their levels are not kept in check. Below is a chart of impurity levels from sapphire produced by two different growth methods: HEM (Heat Exchange Method) and Kyropoulos Method.

Impurity Concentration (parts per million)

Element

Li

Na

Si

Cl

K

Ti

Cr

Fe

Kyropoulus

< 0.05

< 0.10

0.11

< 0.10

< 0.50

0.19

< 0.50

< 1.00

HEM

< 0.12

0.66

9.48

2.58

0.39

0.21

1.10

2.52

The quality of a sapphire is determined by how closely the grown crystal matches the ideal structure with respect to the arrangement of atoms within the lattice, dislocations, defects, and stress.  The root causes for these problems often originate from insufficient purity of the starting material and the growth process itself.  The effects of these variables in the final product are commonly quantified by three metrics: chemical analysis, X-ray rocking curves, and optical transmission.  Additionally, the observance of bubbles in the crystal provides a baseline from which crystal quality is determined because bubbles serve as scattering centers for any light transmitted through a sapphire optic, thus reducing its performance. 

Impurity Concentration (parts per million)

Element

Li

Na

Si

Cl

K

Ti

Cr

Fe

Rubicon ES2 Sapphire

< 0.05

< 0.10

0.11

< 0.10

< 0.50

0.19

< 0.50

< 1.00

 

HEM Sapphire

< 0.12

0.66

9.48

2.58

0.39

0.21

1.10

2.52

Table 1. Elemental analysis obtained by GDMS for sapphire produced by two different growth methods.
Table 1. Elemental analysis obtained by GDMS for sapphire produced by two different growth methods.

x-Ray_Rocking_Curve_for_Rubicon_ES2

Figure 1. X-ray rocking curve for Rubicon ES2 sapphire with a peak width 9.29 arcseconds, indicative of extremely high quality, stress free crystals.

The data was collected at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Lab with the help of Albert Macrander.  Typical results for sapphire are in the range of 20 to 30 arcseconds whereas Rubicon’s material has a FWHM of 9.29 arcseconds, an indication of excellent atomic uniformity.  Such a narrow peak width is obtained through careful optimization of the sapphire growth process.  High thermal gradients, fast growth rates, and impurities contributed by the surrounding insulation can introduce defects and stress into the crystal that subsequently yield poor results in rocking curve data.  By accurately controlling the temperature gradient and maintaining a stable growth interface throughout the entire process, Rubicon is able to produce near-perfect crystals, ensuring the highest possible performance for optical systems.

optical_transmission_of_sapphire

Figure 2. Optical transmission of sapphire depicting a sharp absorption peak at 200 nm for sapphire produced by a commercial producer that is absent in sapphire grown by Rubicon.  Inset: Optical transmission for Rubicon sapphire from the visible to mid-IR range approaching 90% due to the high quality of the material. 

Written by Jonathan Levine, PhD, who is Director of Technical Business Development at Rubicon Technology in Bensenville, Illinois.

DOWNLOAD PDF